<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 256 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444033</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, concluding that the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in assessing the additional income declared towards excess stock under Section 69B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to assess the income under the head &quot;income from business &amp;amp; profession&quot; as declared by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2023 08:31:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 256 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444033</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, concluding that the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in assessing the additional income declared towards excess stock under Section 69B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to assess the income under the head &quot;income from business &amp;amp; profession&quot; as declared by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>