<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 228 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444005</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order rejecting the appellant&#039;s appeal on service tax, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal held that builders were not liable to pay service tax for constructing residential complexes before 01-07-2010, as established by previous decisions and CBEC circulars. The penalties imposed were dismissed, and consequential relief was granted to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2023 08:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 228 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444005</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order rejecting the appellant&#039;s appeal on service tax, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal held that builders were not liable to pay service tax for constructing residential complexes before 01-07-2010, as established by previous decisions and CBEC circulars. The penalties imposed were dismissed, and consequential relief was granted to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>