<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 222 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443999</link>
    <description>The appellant was found not liable to pay duty during the default period without utilizing cenvat credit under Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal, following the precedent set by the Gujarat High Court in the case of Indsur Global Ltd., held that the provisions of Rule 8(3A) were ultravirus, allowing the appellant to utilize cenvat credit even during default periods. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 09:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 222 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443999</link>
      <description>The appellant was found not liable to pay duty during the default period without utilizing cenvat credit under Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal, following the precedent set by the Gujarat High Court in the case of Indsur Global Ltd., held that the provisions of Rule 8(3A) were ultravirus, allowing the appellant to utilize cenvat credit even during default periods. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>