https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310095 Discovery evidence was upheld where the accused's disclosure led the investigating agency to facts and material objects not previously known; physical pointing-out of every article was unnecessary so long as the information was the immediate cause of discovery. Confessions recorded under the special anti-terror law were also sustained because oral warning, verified voluntariness, sufficient time for reconsideration, and the surrounding circumstances showed substantial compliance with statutory safeguards, with no proved arrest irregularity or delay fatal to admissibility. On the merits, the court found that conspiracy and a terrorist act could be proved by the cumulative circumstantial evidence, including recoveries, translated computer material and medical evidence; the principal convictions were affirmed, while the Arms Act conviction was corrected to the proper provision with reduced sentence. en-us Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Oct 2023 14:33:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310095 Discovery evidence was upheld where the accused's disclosure led the investigating agency to facts and material objects not previously known; physical pointing-out of every article was unnecessary so long as the information was the immediate cause of discovery. Confessions recorded under the special anti-terror law were also sustained because oral warning, verified voluntariness, sufficient time for reconsideration, and the surrounding circumstances showed substantial compliance with statutory safeguards, with no proved arrest irregularity or delay fatal to admissibility. On the merits, the court found that conspiracy and a terrorist act could be proved by the cumulative circumstantial evidence, including recoveries, translated computer material and medical evidence; the principal convictions were affirmed, while the Arms Act conviction was corrected to the proper provision with reduced sentence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310095