https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310094 The revenue's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes as the Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not adequately address the lack of evidence for services rendered and the high commission rate claimed by the assessee. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The cross objection supporting the deletion of disallowance of commission expenses was dismissed as infructuous due to the Tribunal's decision. en-us Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Oct 2023 11:50:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310094 The revenue's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes as the Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not adequately address the lack of evidence for services rendered and the high commission rate claimed by the assessee. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The cross objection supporting the deletion of disallowance of commission expenses was dismissed as infructuous due to the Tribunal's decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310094