https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310082 The court dismissed the writ petition due to the availability of an alternative remedy and the petitioner's failure to comply with statutory provisions on the valuation and assessment of excisable goods. Despite arguments for provisional assessment and the interpretation of relevant legal provisions, the court upheld the Assistant Commissioner's decision, emphasizing adherence to prescribed procedures for duty payment. The court's decision was rooted in legal analysis and precedent, underscoring the importance of statutory compliance in excise matters. en-us Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Oct 2023 08:20:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310082 The court dismissed the writ petition due to the availability of an alternative remedy and the petitioner's failure to comply with statutory provisions on the valuation and assessment of excisable goods. Despite arguments for provisional assessment and the interpretation of relevant legal provisions, the court upheld the Assistant Commissioner's decision, emphasizing adherence to prescribed procedures for duty payment. The court's decision was rooted in legal analysis and precedent, underscoring the importance of statutory compliance in excise matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310082