https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310085 Remand orders passed by a competent court in exercise of judicial power were not liable to interference in collateral proceedings where the record showed consideration of the merits and the justification for custody. The legality of detention had to be tested by reference to the dates of the remand orders, so the petitioners' challenge based only on alleged initial illegality failed. Interim release was also refused because the allegations under investigation were serious, including improper favour and laundering-related activity, and the investigation remained ongoing. On that basis, no ground for interference was made out and the petitions were declined. en-us Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Oct 2023 08:20:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310085 Remand orders passed by a competent court in exercise of judicial power were not liable to interference in collateral proceedings where the record showed consideration of the merits and the justification for custody. The legality of detention had to be tested by reference to the dates of the remand orders, so the petitioners' challenge based only on alleged initial illegality failed. Interim release was also refused because the allegations under investigation were serious, including improper favour and laundering-related activity, and the investigation remained ongoing. On that basis, no ground for interference was made out and the petitions were declined. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310085