<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 217 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443994</link>
    <description>HC quashed tax order due to lack of proper personal hearing under Section 75(4) of GST Act. Despite respondents suggesting alternative appeal remedy, court found procedural defect fatal. Order remitted for fresh proceedings, mandating petitioner be given opportunity to present case with specified hearing details, upholding principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 217 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443994</link>
      <description>HC quashed tax order due to lack of proper personal hearing under Section 75(4) of GST Act. Despite respondents suggesting alternative appeal remedy, court found procedural defect fatal. Order remitted for fresh proceedings, mandating petitioner be given opportunity to present case with specified hearing details, upholding principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>