<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 18 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34194</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI, in 2009 (7) TMI 18, upheld the liability of the appellants for service tax concerning their activities of loading and unloading goods for Steel Authority of India Ltd. The tribunal deemed the appellants to have provided cargo handling services as per the Finance Act, 1994, and held them liable for tax and penalty for non-registration. The appeal was rejected, affirming the initial order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 06:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 18 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34194</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI, in 2009 (7) TMI 18, upheld the liability of the appellants for service tax concerning their activities of loading and unloading goods for Steel Authority of India Ltd. The tribunal deemed the appellants to have provided cargo handling services as per the Finance Act, 1994, and held them liable for tax and penalty for non-registration. The appeal was rejected, affirming the initial order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>