<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 42 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34193</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants&#039; application for waiver of predeposit of dues and early hearing, remanding the case for reconciliation of errors in the service tax figures provided. The demand for differential service tax was based on incorrect figures in the ST-3 returns, necessitating a thorough review to ensure accurate payment. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting the appellants the chance to address discrepancies and present their case for a fair resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 42 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34193</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants&#039; application for waiver of predeposit of dues and early hearing, remanding the case for reconciliation of errors in the service tax figures provided. The demand for differential service tax was based on incorrect figures in the ST-3 returns, necessitating a thorough review to ensure accurate payment. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting the appellants the chance to address discrepancies and present their case for a fair resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>