<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 37 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34186</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal CESTAT, Chennai allowed the appeal by way of remand. The impugned order denying benefits under specific notifications was set aside, and the case was remitted to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision after considering the documentary evidence. The tribunal found that the appellants had paid service tax on goods and materials as indicated in their sales tax returns, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 37 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34186</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal CESTAT, Chennai allowed the appeal by way of remand. The impugned order denying benefits under specific notifications was set aside, and the case was remitted to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision after considering the documentary evidence. The tribunal found that the appellants had paid service tax on goods and materials as indicated in their sales tax returns, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>