<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (5) TMI 50 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310073</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the validity of Section 11(1) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, dismissing the appeal. It found the grounds of detention sufficient and rejected allegations of mala fides. However, A.K. Sarkar, J., dissented, deeming the Act unconstitutional for failing to comply with Article 22(4)(a) of the Constitution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 11:16:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (5) TMI 50 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310073</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the validity of Section 11(1) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, dismissing the appeal. It found the grounds of detention sufficient and rejected allegations of mala fides. However, A.K. Sarkar, J., dissented, deeming the Act unconstitutional for failing to comply with Article 22(4)(a) of the Constitution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>