<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 36 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34185</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai held that the appellants are not liable to pay interest for delayed remittance of service tax during certain periods. The decision was influenced by past cases where government departments were not charged interest for delayed tax payments. The order requiring interest was overturned, and the appeal was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 36 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34185</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai held that the appellants are not liable to pay interest for delayed remittance of service tax during certain periods. The decision was influenced by past cases where government departments were not charged interest for delayed tax payments. The order requiring interest was overturned, and the appeal was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>