<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 152 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443929</link>
    <description>Cancellation of GST registration was assailed on the ground that the cancellation order was unreasoned. The HC held that reasons are the &quot;heart and soul&quot; of an administrative/quasi-judicial order, and an order entailing harsh civil consequences without any reasons is arbitrary and violative of Article 14; hence, it is unsustainable in law. The HC further held that dismissal of the statutory appeal as time-barred under s.107(4) does not attract the doctrine of merger because there was no adjudication on merits. The cancellation order was quashed, the petitioner was directed to file a reply to the show-cause notice within three weeks, and the authority was directed to pass a fresh order after affording an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 152 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443929</link>
      <description>Cancellation of GST registration was assailed on the ground that the cancellation order was unreasoned. The HC held that reasons are the &quot;heart and soul&quot; of an administrative/quasi-judicial order, and an order entailing harsh civil consequences without any reasons is arbitrary and violative of Article 14; hence, it is unsustainable in law. The HC further held that dismissal of the statutory appeal as time-barred under s.107(4) does not attract the doctrine of merger because there was no adjudication on merits. The cancellation order was quashed, the petitioner was directed to file a reply to the show-cause notice within three weeks, and the authority was directed to pass a fresh order after affording an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>