<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 145 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443922</link>
    <description>SC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging GST penalty proceedings for hand sanitizer classification. The court found penalty imposition unjustified given the debatable nature of tax classification. Writ petition was allowed, setting aside penalty order and directing jurisdictional authority to reconsider proceedings consistent with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 145 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443922</link>
      <description>SC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging GST penalty proceedings for hand sanitizer classification. The court found penalty imposition unjustified given the debatable nature of tax classification. Writ petition was allowed, setting aside penalty order and directing jurisdictional authority to reconsider proceedings consistent with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>