<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 142 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443919</link>
    <description>HC ruled that the petitioner is entitled to GST refund from IRCTC following contract cancellation. IRCTC must refund the amount within three weeks and can separately apply for complementary refund from GST authorities. The court emphasized that the complementary refund will be considered based on legal provisions, without mandating automatic approval.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 142 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443919</link>
      <description>HC ruled that the petitioner is entitled to GST refund from IRCTC following contract cancellation. IRCTC must refund the amount within three weeks and can separately apply for complementary refund from GST authorities. The court emphasized that the complementary refund will be considered based on legal provisions, without mandating automatic approval.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>