<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 141 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443918</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax assessment order. The appeal was filed beyond permissible timelines under Section 107 of BGST Act, lacking necessary documentation and satisfactory reasons for delay. Court found no grounds to invoke extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226, emphasizing importance of exhausting alternate remedies within stipulated timeframes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 141 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443918</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax assessment order. The appeal was filed beyond permissible timelines under Section 107 of BGST Act, lacking necessary documentation and satisfactory reasons for delay. Court found no grounds to invoke extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226, emphasizing importance of exhausting alternate remedies within stipulated timeframes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>