<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 136 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443913</link>
    <description>The court quashed the order and notice issued under the Income Tax Act, 1961, as they were found to be beyond the prescribed period and based on a &quot;change of opinion.&quot; The assessment for the year 2014-15 was reopened beyond the four-year limit, leading to the court ruling in favor of the petitioner. Consequently, the petition was allowed, and the impugned notice and order were set aside with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 07:44:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 136 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443913</link>
      <description>The court quashed the order and notice issued under the Income Tax Act, 1961, as they were found to be beyond the prescribed period and based on a &quot;change of opinion.&quot; The assessment for the year 2014-15 was reopened beyond the four-year limit, leading to the court ruling in favor of the petitioner. Consequently, the petition was allowed, and the impugned notice and order were set aside with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>