https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443912 The court upheld the assessment orders against the petitioner, a registered society, for incorrect PAN allocation and misrepresentation of status as an AOP instead of a firm. Despite obtaining a new PAN, assessments were conducted under both old and new PAN numbers. The court dismissed the revision filed by the petitioner, ruling that the challenge was improper due to fee payment under the new PAN account. Emphasizing misrepresentation by the petitioner, the court found no grounds to interfere with the assessment orders, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition. en-us Thu, 04 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Oct 2023 07:44:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443912 The court upheld the assessment orders against the petitioner, a registered society, for incorrect PAN allocation and misrepresentation of status as an AOP instead of a firm. Despite obtaining a new PAN, assessments were conducted under both old and new PAN numbers. The court dismissed the revision filed by the petitioner, ruling that the challenge was improper due to fee payment under the new PAN account. Emphasizing misrepresentation by the petitioner, the court found no grounds to interfere with the assessment orders, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 04 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443912