<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 134 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443911</link>
    <description>The CIT(A) directed the AO to delete the addition declared as advance by the assessee and offered to tax in subsequent years based on project completion. The restriction on TDS credit to the income of Rs. 9,79,79,884 for the assessment year 2008-09 was upheld. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed due to the consistent accounting practice followed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 134 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443911</link>
      <description>The CIT(A) directed the AO to delete the addition declared as advance by the assessee and offered to tax in subsequent years based on project completion. The restriction on TDS credit to the income of Rs. 9,79,79,884 for the assessment year 2008-09 was upheld. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed due to the consistent accounting practice followed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>