<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 121 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443898</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand due to fake DEPB scrips, but as there was no fraudulent intent, the penalty was overturned. The appeal was partially granted, stressing the need to verify document authenticity to prevent liability and the repercussions of fraud in transactions involving DEPB scrips.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 07:43:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 121 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443898</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand due to fake DEPB scrips, but as there was no fraudulent intent, the penalty was overturned. The appeal was partially granted, stressing the need to verify document authenticity to prevent liability and the repercussions of fraud in transactions involving DEPB scrips.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>