<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 113 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443890</link>
    <description>Mark-up earned on ocean freight was treated as trading income arising from purchase and sale of cargo space, not as consideration for a taxable service. On that reasoning, the service tax demand could not survive, particularly because an earlier decision in the same assessee&#039;s case had already taken the same view for a prior period. The demand was set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 113 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443890</link>
      <description>Mark-up earned on ocean freight was treated as trading income arising from purchase and sale of cargo space, not as consideration for a taxable service. On that reasoning, the service tax demand could not survive, particularly because an earlier decision in the same assessee&#039;s case had already taken the same view for a prior period. The demand was set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>