https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443883 A writ petition challenging penalty and remand orders under the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 was held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal under Section 57 was available. The Court reasoned that the petitioner could raise all factual and legal objections before the appellate authority, so there was no justification to bypass the statutory remedy and invoke Article 226. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the appellate forum, and writ jurisdiction was not exercised in light of the alternative remedy principle. en-us Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Oct 2023 07:42:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443883 A writ petition challenging penalty and remand orders under the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 was held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal under Section 57 was available. The Court reasoned that the petitioner could raise all factual and legal objections before the appellate authority, so there was no justification to bypass the statutory remedy and invoke Article 226. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the appellate forum, and writ jurisdiction was not exercised in light of the alternative remedy principle. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443883