<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1819 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310054</link>
    <description>A non-resident French company&#039;s corporate guarantee commission was held not taxable in India because the guarantee was furnished in France to a French bank, the transaction was entirely executed in France, and no service was rendered in India. The Tribunal applied its earlier rulings in the assessee&#039;s own case and held that the income neither accrued nor arose in India, nor could it be deemed to accrue in India under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It further held that Article 23.3 of the India-France DTAA applied only where the income arose in India, which was not satisfied on these facts, so the commission was outside Indian tax net.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 20:59:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1819 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310054</link>
      <description>A non-resident French company&#039;s corporate guarantee commission was held not taxable in India because the guarantee was furnished in France to a French bank, the transaction was entirely executed in France, and no service was rendered in India. The Tribunal applied its earlier rulings in the assessee&#039;s own case and held that the income neither accrued nor arose in India, nor could it be deemed to accrue in India under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It further held that Article 23.3 of the India-France DTAA applied only where the income arose in India, which was not satisfied on these facts, so the commission was outside Indian tax net.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>