https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310067 Constructive res judicata applies in writ proceedings and bars a party from raising a plea that was available but not pleaded in earlier litigation; the later challenge was therefore not maintainable. The 1966 Regulations did not confer any perpetual right on an expired grantee to remain in possession until a ground under Regulation 151 arose, because the scheme limits grants to a fixed period, treats tenants and grantees differently, and preserves pre-existing obligations to surrender possession under the saving clause. An expired grant could not be converted into an indefinite right of occupation under the repealed regime. en-us Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Oct 2023 20:59:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310067 Constructive res judicata applies in writ proceedings and bars a party from raising a plea that was available but not pleaded in earlier litigation; the later challenge was therefore not maintainable. The 1966 Regulations did not confer any perpetual right on an expired grantee to remain in possession until a ground under Regulation 151 arose, because the scheme limits grants to a fixed period, treats tenants and grantees differently, and preserves pre-existing obligations to surrender possession under the saving clause. An expired grant could not be converted into an indefinite right of occupation under the repealed regime. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310067