<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2842 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310052</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellants in multiple appeals concerning the availing of CENVAT credit on inputs procured from a 100% EOU. The Tribunal held that the BCD mentioned in the formula for calculating the credit should reflect the BCD leviable on similar goods if imported into India, not the actual amount paid by the EOU. Citing a precedent decision, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed all appeals in favor of the appellants, providing consequential relief to resolve the issue in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 20:59:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2842 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310052</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellants in multiple appeals concerning the availing of CENVAT credit on inputs procured from a 100% EOU. The Tribunal held that the BCD mentioned in the formula for calculating the credit should reflect the BCD leviable on similar goods if imported into India, not the actual amount paid by the EOU. Citing a precedent decision, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed all appeals in favor of the appellants, providing consequential relief to resolve the issue in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>