<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 912 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310047</link>
    <description>Preventive detention is not vitiated by delay in serving the order where the authorities give a satisfactory explanation and the detenu remains untraceable or absconding, so the live link with the detention purpose is not shown to have snapped. Delay in considering a representation will not breach Article 22(5) where it is explained by calling for comments, holidays and movement of files, and the decision is reached within a reasonable time. Detention based on possession of undeclared foreign currency and travellers&#039; cheques was sustained because the material supported subjective satisfaction that the conduct was prejudicial to foreign exchange augmentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 912 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310047</link>
      <description>Preventive detention is not vitiated by delay in serving the order where the authorities give a satisfactory explanation and the detenu remains untraceable or absconding, so the live link with the detention purpose is not shown to have snapped. Delay in considering a representation will not breach Article 22(5) where it is explained by calling for comments, holidays and movement of files, and the decision is reached within a reasonable time. Detention based on possession of undeclared foreign currency and travellers&#039; cheques was sustained because the material supported subjective satisfaction that the conduct was prejudicial to foreign exchange augmentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>