https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310029 Under Order 21 Rule 40(2) CPC, the Court noted that directing a bank guarantee as security for decretal dues falls within judicial discretion when interim relief is sought. After examining the High Court's order requiring the petitioner to furnish a bank guarantee against the decretal liability, the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere in view of the facts and circumstances and the discretion exercised below. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and the High Court's security direction was left undisturbed. en-us Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Oct 2023 07:19:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310029 Under Order 21 Rule 40(2) CPC, the Court noted that directing a bank guarantee as security for decretal dues falls within judicial discretion when interim relief is sought. After examining the High Court's order requiring the petitioner to furnish a bank guarantee against the decretal liability, the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere in view of the facts and circumstances and the discretion exercised below. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and the High Court's security direction was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310029