<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2126 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310035</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by &#039;M/s Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund&#039; against the rejection of their application related to &#039;M/s Datre Corporation Ltd.&#039; was dismissed by the Adjudicating Authority. The Appellant&#039;s attempt to recall the order admitting the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was deemed outside the Authority&#039;s jurisdiction. The Appellant&#039;s exclusion from the Committee of Creditors and challenges to the admission of the application were rejected. The Authority found the Interlocutory Application frivolous and imposed a cost of Rs.1 Lakh on the Appellant. The appeal outcome favored the Adjudicating Authority, upholding the dismissal and cost imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 07:19:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2126 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310035</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by &#039;M/s Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund&#039; against the rejection of their application related to &#039;M/s Datre Corporation Ltd.&#039; was dismissed by the Adjudicating Authority. The Appellant&#039;s attempt to recall the order admitting the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was deemed outside the Authority&#039;s jurisdiction. The Appellant&#039;s exclusion from the Committee of Creditors and challenges to the admission of the application were rejected. The Authority found the Interlocutory Application frivolous and imposed a cost of Rs.1 Lakh on the Appellant. The appeal outcome favored the Adjudicating Authority, upholding the dismissal and cost imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>