<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1572 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310026</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Plaintiff&#039;s suit against NHIDC due to lack of privity of contract and ongoing insolvency proceedings against ITNL. The Plaintiff was directed to seek resolution through NCLAT and suggested a review of the government&#039;s memorandum on &quot;stuck projects.&quot; A meeting was ordered to resolve payment issues with the sub-contractor. ITNL and SSTL were impleaded as necessary parties in the suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 07:19:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1572 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310026</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Plaintiff&#039;s suit against NHIDC due to lack of privity of contract and ongoing insolvency proceedings against ITNL. The Plaintiff was directed to seek resolution through NCLAT and suggested a review of the government&#039;s memorandum on &quot;stuck projects.&quot; A meeting was ordered to resolve payment issues with the sub-contractor. ITNL and SSTL were impleaded as necessary parties in the suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>