<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 1109 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310031</link>
    <description>An offence under Section 3(1)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 requires intentional caste-based insult or humiliation directed at a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe member in a place within public view. A mere property dispute, even with abusive allegations, does not by itself satisfy that ingredient, and conduct alleged to have occurred within a building without public presence was insufficient. The inherent power under Section 482 CrPC may be used to quash only the unsustainable part of a charge-sheet, while the remaining offences may proceed. The atrocity charge was therefore quashed, but prosecution continued for the other offences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 07:19:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 1109 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310031</link>
      <description>An offence under Section 3(1)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 requires intentional caste-based insult or humiliation directed at a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe member in a place within public view. A mere property dispute, even with abusive allegations, does not by itself satisfy that ingredient, and conduct alleged to have occurred within a building without public presence was insufficient. The inherent power under Section 482 CrPC may be used to quash only the unsustainable part of a charge-sheet, while the remaining offences may proceed. The atrocity charge was therefore quashed, but prosecution continued for the other offences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>