https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443881 HC examined challenges to GST Act communication and service orders. Court directed state to explain service interpretation under section 169, noting portal availability does not automatically constitute legal service. Granted interim relief by prohibiting coercive action against petitioner, contingent on 50% tax deposit, and provided respondents four weeks to file counter affidavit. en-us Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443881 HC examined challenges to GST Act communication and service orders. Court directed state to explain service interpretation under section 169, noting portal availability does not automatically constitute legal service. Granted interim relief by prohibiting coercive action against petitioner, contingent on 50% tax deposit, and provided respondents four weeks to file counter affidavit. Case-Laws GST Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443881