<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 209 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34166</link>
    <description>Eligibility for post-export transferable DFIA depends on compliance with the underlying Foreign Trade Policy conditions, including the substantive requirement of a supporting manufacturer tie-up. A later policy circular that relaxed documentary proof for redemption and transferability did not override those foundational eligibility or validate a licence obtained on a different basis. Where export materials were procured from a trader and the supporting-manufacturer details were furnished only later, the defect was not cured. The authorities were therefore within power to cancel the licence, and the appellate rejection was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 209 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34166</link>
      <description>Eligibility for post-export transferable DFIA depends on compliance with the underlying Foreign Trade Policy conditions, including the substantive requirement of a supporting manufacturer tie-up. A later policy circular that relaxed documentary proof for redemption and transferability did not override those foundational eligibility or validate a licence obtained on a different basis. Where export materials were procured from a trader and the supporting-manufacturer details were furnished only later, the defect was not cured. The authorities were therefore within power to cancel the licence, and the appellate rejection was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>