<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 68 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443845</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order for liquidation and extended the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for 60 days to allow the Committee of Creditors (CoC) to consider a revised offer from one appellant. The CoC was instructed to only consider the revised offer submitted by the appellant. If the Resolution Plan was approved, an application should be filed for approval; if not, the Resolution Professional should promptly file for liquidation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 68 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443845</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order for liquidation and extended the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for 60 days to allow the Committee of Creditors (CoC) to consider a revised offer from one appellant. The CoC was instructed to only consider the revised offer submitted by the appellant. If the Resolution Plan was approved, an application should be filed for approval; if not, the Resolution Professional should promptly file for liquidation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>