<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 66 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443843</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging provisional attachment orders under the PMLA, emphasizing the availability of statutory remedies through the Adjudicating Authority, Appellate Tribunal, and High Court. The petitioners&#039; objections were directed to be considered within the statutory framework, highlighting the importance of following prescribed procedures and avoiding bypassing statutory mechanisms unless exceptional circumstances exist.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 07:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 66 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443843</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging provisional attachment orders under the PMLA, emphasizing the availability of statutory remedies through the Adjudicating Authority, Appellate Tribunal, and High Court. The petitioners&#039; objections were directed to be considered within the statutory framework, highlighting the importance of following prescribed procedures and avoiding bypassing statutory mechanisms unless exceptional circumstances exist.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>