<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 370 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34165</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the original adjudicating authority for the appellants to produce evidence proving that the duty burden was not passed on, thereby addressing the issue of unjust enrichment. The judgment emphasized the applicability of Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the necessity for appellants to challenge the final assessment order promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 370 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34165</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the original adjudicating authority for the appellants to produce evidence proving that the duty burden was not passed on, thereby addressing the issue of unjust enrichment. The judgment emphasized the applicability of Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the necessity for appellants to challenge the final assessment order promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>