<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 51 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of a claim for refund of service tax amounting to Rs. 17,98,429 as the claim was filed beyond the one-year limitation period from the date of payment of tax, in accordance with Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant&#039;s argument that the relevant date should be the termination of the Memorandum of Understanding was dismissed, and the Tribunal relied on the precedent set by the Supreme Court to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 51 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of a claim for refund of service tax amounting to Rs. 17,98,429 as the claim was filed beyond the one-year limitation period from the date of payment of tax, in accordance with Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant&#039;s argument that the relevant date should be the termination of the Memorandum of Understanding was dismissed, and the Tribunal relied on the precedent set by the Supreme Court to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>