https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443824 The conviction and sentence of the applicant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, for dishonoring a cheque were upheld by the appellate court. The courts found the evidence presented by the complainant to be sufficient, including the presumption under Section 139 of the Act that a cheque is for the discharge of a debt unless proven otherwise. The High Court dismissed the revision filed by the applicant, emphasizing the limited scope of revisional powers and the absence of material irregularity or illegality in the lower court's order. en-us Thu, 31 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Oct 2023 16:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443824 The conviction and sentence of the applicant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, for dishonoring a cheque were upheld by the appellate court. The courts found the evidence presented by the complainant to be sufficient, including the presumption under Section 139 of the Act that a cheque is for the discharge of a debt unless proven otherwise. The High Court dismissed the revision filed by the applicant, emphasizing the limited scope of revisional powers and the absence of material irregularity or illegality in the lower court's order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 31 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443824