<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 46 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443823</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the respondent was held guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The respondent was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.5 Lakhs to the appellant within 3 months, with a default provision of 1-year rigorous imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The Court emphasized the presumption in favor of the holder under Section 139 of the NI Act, setting aside the Trial Court&#039;s acquittal judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 07:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 46 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443823</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the respondent was held guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The respondent was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.5 Lakhs to the appellant within 3 months, with a default provision of 1-year rigorous imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The Court emphasized the presumption in favor of the holder under Section 139 of the NI Act, setting aside the Trial Court&#039;s acquittal judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>