https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310016 A decision between other parties does not become a judgment in rem merely because it concerns title, adoption, or ownership of attached property. A judgment in rem binds the world only within the limited classes recognised by Section 41 of the Indian Evidence Act; ordinary inter partes civil findings do not have that effect. The earlier High Court ruling, being confined to other litigants, could not bind the petitioner in execution objection proceedings. An order under Order 21 Rule 58, or a decree under Order 21 Rule 63, also operates only within the execution proceedings from which it arises. The objection was therefore not concluded by res judicata or judgment in rem. en-us Tue, 03 Apr 1956 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Oct 2023 15:10:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310016 A decision between other parties does not become a judgment in rem merely because it concerns title, adoption, or ownership of attached property. A judgment in rem binds the world only within the limited classes recognised by Section 41 of the Indian Evidence Act; ordinary inter partes civil findings do not have that effect. The earlier High Court ruling, being confined to other litigants, could not bind the petitioner in execution objection proceedings. An order under Order 21 Rule 58, or a decree under Order 21 Rule 63, also operates only within the execution proceedings from which it arises. The objection was therefore not concluded by res judicata or judgment in rem. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Apr 1956 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310016