https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310008 Correction of category-wise vacancy calculation to align recruitment with the statutory reservation framework was held valid, as it did not alter eligibility, selection method or assessment criteria. Revising the vacancy break-up after advertisement was therefore not a change in the rules of selection. Candidates who participated in the interview with knowledge of the revised vacancies and without protest were barred from challenging the process after failing. The absorption of diploma holders against the general quota was accepted as a rectification of an earlier miscount, and the selection was not liable to be set aside on that ground. Article 142 could not be invoked to appoint candidates in excess of permissible reservation limits. en-us Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Oct 2023 08:40:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310008 Correction of category-wise vacancy calculation to align recruitment with the statutory reservation framework was held valid, as it did not alter eligibility, selection method or assessment criteria. Revising the vacancy break-up after advertisement was therefore not a change in the rules of selection. Candidates who participated in the interview with knowledge of the revised vacancies and without protest were barred from challenging the process after failing. The absorption of diploma holders against the general quota was accepted as a rectification of an earlier miscount, and the selection was not liable to be set aside on that ground. Article 142 could not be invoked to appoint candidates in excess of permissible reservation limits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310008