<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 33 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443810</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the assessee is eligible for exemptions under Sections 11, 12, and 10(23C)(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found no violation of Section 13(2)(b), emphasizing the importance of consistent application of law and the necessity of substantial evidence to support claims of violations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 08:39:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 33 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443810</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the assessee is eligible for exemptions under Sections 11, 12, and 10(23C)(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found no violation of Section 13(2)(b), emphasizing the importance of consistent application of law and the necessity of substantial evidence to support claims of violations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>