<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 25 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443802</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes, with the matter remanded back to the CIT(Appeals) for re-adjudication on the merits of the case. The Tribunal emphasized that the original assessment order does not get wiped out by the reassessment order, and the CIT(Appeals) should have confined his adjudication to the validity of the jurisdiction assumed by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 25 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443802</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes, with the matter remanded back to the CIT(Appeals) for re-adjudication on the merits of the case. The Tribunal emphasized that the original assessment order does not get wiped out by the reassessment order, and the CIT(Appeals) should have confined his adjudication to the validity of the jurisdiction assumed by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>