<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 324 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34154</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed on him under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appeal was allowed due to the lack of substantial evidence linking the appellant to the fraudulent export practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 324 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34154</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed on him under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appeal was allowed due to the lack of substantial evidence linking the appellant to the fraudulent export practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>