<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (6) TMI 108 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310004</link>
    <description>A foreman&#039;s consolidated claim for future chitty subscriptions was held to depend on the Travancore Chitties Act, which required a prior written demand before such recovery became enforceable, so limitation did not run merely from default in an instalment. Article 37 of the Limitation Act was therefore inapplicable to the consolidated claim. On the alternative limitation basis, recovery was confined to instalments falling within three years before suit, because earlier instalments were already time-barred. The decree was accordingly reduced to the amount recoverable within the limitation period, and the balance was disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2023 11:58:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (6) TMI 108 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310004</link>
      <description>A foreman&#039;s consolidated claim for future chitty subscriptions was held to depend on the Travancore Chitties Act, which required a prior written demand before such recovery became enforceable, so limitation did not run merely from default in an instalment. Article 37 of the Limitation Act was therefore inapplicable to the consolidated claim. On the alternative limitation basis, recovery was confined to instalments falling within three years before suit, because earlier instalments were already time-barred. The decree was accordingly reduced to the amount recoverable within the limitation period, and the balance was disallowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>