<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1370 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443748</link>
    <description>Rule 10 of the Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008 provides proportionate abatement where notified goods are not produced for a continuous period of fifteen days or more, provided prior intimation is given and the machines are sealed under departmental supervision. The assessee had complied with these conditions, and the record showed that the machines remained non-operational during the sealed period. The rule does not require full monthly duty to be paid first as a condition for claiming abatement. Consistent with the cited High Court view, the scheme treats abatement as a reduction in duty, not a refund, so duty may be computed only for the period of actual operation once the rule conditions are met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2023 08:26:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1370 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443748</link>
      <description>Rule 10 of the Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008 provides proportionate abatement where notified goods are not produced for a continuous period of fifteen days or more, provided prior intimation is given and the machines are sealed under departmental supervision. The assessee had complied with these conditions, and the record showed that the machines remained non-operational during the sealed period. The rule does not require full monthly duty to be paid first as a condition for claiming abatement. Consistent with the cited High Court view, the scheme treats abatement as a reduction in duty, not a refund, so duty may be computed only for the period of actual operation once the rule conditions are met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>