https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443738 The court quashed the proceedings in S.T.C.No.17 of 2020 on the basis of the petitioner's arguments that the cheque was not issued for a legally enforceable debt and that it was for a time-barred debt, as there was no written acknowledgment within the limitation period. The court found merit in these contentions and allowed the petition, leading to the quashing of the proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. en-us Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Sep 2023 08:26:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443738 The court quashed the proceedings in S.T.C.No.17 of 2020 on the basis of the petitioner's arguments that the cheque was not issued for a legally enforceable debt and that it was for a time-barred debt, as there was no written acknowledgment within the limitation period. The court found merit in these contentions and allowed the petition, leading to the quashing of the proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443738