<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1358 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443736</link>
    <description>HC considered a petition challenging a summary report issued for transporting goods without valid documents and for alleged excess ITC claim. In an affidavit, the authority requested permission to withdraw the impugned order forming the basis of the summary report dated 21.02.2019. Accepting this position, HC quashed and set aside the said summary report, granting liberty to the authority in terms stated in the affidavit. The petition was accordingly partly allowed, with no adjudication on the underlying merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1358 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443736</link>
      <description>HC considered a petition challenging a summary report issued for transporting goods without valid documents and for alleged excess ITC claim. In an affidavit, the authority requested permission to withdraw the impugned order forming the basis of the summary report dated 21.02.2019. Accepting this position, HC quashed and set aside the said summary report, granting liberty to the authority in terms stated in the affidavit. The petition was accordingly partly allowed, with no adjudication on the underlying merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>