<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 183 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34141</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of war material but set aside the penalty of Rs. 75,000 imposed on the appellant. The decision emphasized the significance of evidence and precedent in determining penalties for customs violations, stressing the requirement for valid reasons to impose penalties on importers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 183 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34141</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of war material but set aside the penalty of Rs. 75,000 imposed on the appellant. The decision emphasized the significance of evidence and precedent in determining penalties for customs violations, stressing the requirement for valid reasons to impose penalties on importers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>