https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309997 In second appeal, concurrent findings of fact may be disturbed only on a genuine substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC; mere reappreciation of evidence is impermissible. An unregistered memorandum recording a family arrangement or partition is not excluded merely for want of registration where it does not itself operate as a conveyance, and it may be relied on to prove the arrangement and the parties' conduct, including by estoppel. Sale deeds may be challenged by a stranger as nominal, fictitious, collusive, or unacted upon, and the surrounding evidence must show whether title actually passed. On the facts discussed, the sale transaction was treated as not acted upon and the ownership claim failed. en-us Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Sep 2025 17:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309997 In second appeal, concurrent findings of fact may be disturbed only on a genuine substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC; mere reappreciation of evidence is impermissible. An unregistered memorandum recording a family arrangement or partition is not excluded merely for want of registration where it does not itself operate as a conveyance, and it may be relied on to prove the arrangement and the parties' conduct, including by estoppel. Sale deeds may be challenged by a stranger as nominal, fictitious, collusive, or unacted upon, and the surrounding evidence must show whether title actually passed. On the facts discussed, the sale transaction was treated as not acted upon and the ownership claim failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309997